![]() To me, keeping the FLAC is like keeping the original camera film. This would sort of be like people who'd get their pictures developed and throw out the negatives. I had to re-rip everything (with a properly configured version of Exact Audio Copy) but this time I kept the FLAC's. ![]() These lessons I learned the hard way.by ripping my whole collection (about 700 CD's with a badly configured ripper), trashing the FLAC's, and only keeping 256K mp3's. I've heard awful FLAC rips and amazing-sounding 256KBPS mp3's. ![]() At least you'll be sure of having the very best MP3/FLAC files possible. Whether you are a music aficionado, a fitness enthusiast. The Apple iPod Touch, Sony NW-A55, SanDisk Clip Jam, and SanDisk Clip Sport Plus each have their own unique advantages, allowing users to choose the one that best fits their needs. Once you get that sorted, and it's bit-accurate, then you can evaluate. The year 2023 still offers some fantastic options for those in search of the perfect MP3 player. I get the feeling the develop is not working on fixing this daily. Read 27 user reviews and compare with similar apps on MacUpdate. If you use those same flawed files to make MP3's then those will be flawed too.Īll that to say that your primary concern should be origin. Download the latest version of dupeGuru for Mac for free. If you're archiving your CD's to FLAC, but aren't getting accurate rips then those files are already flawed (minor or major, depending). Ripping CD's, for example, requires some fiddling before you're getting bit-accurate rips. There's important info missing in your question. And CD's and digital FLAC files rarely cost much more than MP3's.įinally and FWIW - I do think their are small-but-real sonic benefits to lossless over lossy, and buying/storing in this format gives you a chance to (potentially) realize that benefit someday in the future. That and it just doesn't cost much to do so. If a new standard we don't have yet grows popular and will work better with future gear we don't yet have, you can make those files from your FLAC files without compounding losses. If you have lossless FLAC files to go back to, you can make the best possible AAC files that AAC can achieve, without compounding the losses already baked into MP3, and then later make the best possible OGG files, etc. So if you make lossy AAC copies from your MP3 files, and then make lossy OGG copies from those ACC files, for some unforseen reason out in the future that you suddenly want/need AAC and then OGG rather than MP3, you just compound losses on top of losses, and at some point you probably WILL be able to notice the losses. The point is that every time you create a lossy copy of something, things get lost forever. MP3 might be future proof, or it might not. Even if you never hear any difference, ever, for any gear you ever own, I'd recommend you use FLAC as your "official storage copy" because you don't know what kind of new standards or formats might exist.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |